The Only Reason there are Male Feminists is for the Assumed Sex..
What Men are saying about Women.
Male Feminists at the Bottom of the Sex Feed Chain.
There has always been certain behaviour that is viewed upon as being just completely insipid, ridiculous or plain stupid and here is a prime example. As we are already well aware, females pick their sex partners for a number of nefarious reason. They have yet to educate themselves on how to stay away from obvious deviants and other complete no-hopers. Among the list of prospective enablers, must meet at least a minimum standard of looks and body shape and size, money helps as well of course.
Being a feminist dork is not one of the pre-requisites.
The other issue that females have problems with is that they do not want to be seen as being a ‘cock-worshipper’, as that too would leave them open for abuse from their own ‘friends’ and rightly so. Most females are quite happy dropping their knickers if some money was spent on them or some effort made to entertain them.
The number one deterrent to the majority of females is a request to have sex without so much as offering something of actual value in return. Their time is money, ask any of them and they will inform you of that fact. Even their presence in marriage or a relationship must be monetarily compensated when SHE decides it’s over. Anyway, we have this cretin male feminist suffering their usual delusional mind-set.
|The Mangina Vagina.|
Stupid is as stupid does!
Controversy has once again hit the campus of UNC-Wilmington. This time it’s not my fault. The controversy is actually the fault of a student. His crime is simple: He decided to behave like a feminist behaves every day on campuses all across America. Unfortunately for him, he chose to do so without the proper genitalia and without the approval of the UNCW Women’s Resource Center.
I was introduced to the controversy shortly after a student of mine finished taking her final exam of the semester. After she had left my 2 pm exam, she came into my 3:30 class and, as discreetly as possible, told me that a male student had just walked up to her and asked if she wanted to have sex with him. It took me a few minutes to figure out that she wasn’t joking. So I asked her to give me more information as we walked out into the hall to look for the offending student.
Apparently, the young man had been working his way through the building asking every female student he saw if she would like to have sex with him. Some just walked away, but some wanted an explanation for the wildly inappropriate request. When pressed, he simply told them he hadn’t had sex all semester and didn’t want to go home for the summer until he had. One woman reacted a little more strongly to his indecent proposal. She started to cry and went upstairs looking for help from someone in the psychology department. That’s when things got interesting.
Fortunately, the visibly shaken student found a concerned psychology professor who went downstairs with her, found the male student, and told him to knock it off. The propositioning student became incensed and told the professor he needed to get over his hang-ups about sex. The student’s argument was pretty simple: Asking someone to have sex is no different than asking them to engage in any other recreational activity such as playing basketball.
Of course, that argument was rejected and the UNCW police were called in to apprehend the student. Fortunately, the psychology building is in walking distance from Dunkin’ Donuts so the police made the trek in less than an hour. Upon arrival, they scoured the building in search of their suspect.
But what crime did the desperately horny student commit? Did he sexually harass these women in a traditional sense? No, this was a case of creating a hostile environment in the workplace. Had he done this in a bar, rather than on campus, there would be no controversy. In other words, the venue made a difference.
Of course, there is another important variable to consider. If he were a female student, his conduct would have been seen in a very different light. In order to assess the possible role that gender played in the incident, please consider the following:
-Every year when they put on The Vagina Monologues, UNCW feminists send out an email that begins with the line “Greetings vagina lovers.” And they use the university email system to send this to everyone. Feminists at another UNC Women’s Center advertised The Vagina Monologues by purchasing a six foot vagina costume. They later took turns walking around campus dressed as a giant sex organ.
-Feminists at the UNCW Women’s Center once advertised The Vagina Monologues with a large sign saying “p***ies unite.” It was posted outside a campus diner where faculty and staff often took their children to eat. Note that those responsible for making the profane sign were professors, not students.
-Feminists at the UNCW Women’s Center sold “p***y pops” made out of candy and shaped to resemble female genitalia. Some feminist professors walked around the lobby of Kenan Auditorium licking the candy-coated genitals in front of students.
-Feminists at the UNCW Women’s Center have set up tables showing people how to put condoms on cucumbers. But this isn’t nearly as bad as the feminist students at UNC-CH who actually built a vibrator museum and erected it (cough) in the middle of campus.
-Feminists at the UNCW Women’s Center posted pictures of nude women- some of them under-aged – in the lobby of Randall Library as part of an “art” exhibit.
-Feminists at the UNCW Women’s Center sold “I had an abortion” tee shirts on campus so students could let strangers know they had killed their own children and were proud of it.
All of these incidents are a reflection of a consistent philosophy promoted by feminists here at UNCW. That philosophy is made up of two core principles: 1) Women have a right to act as vulgar as they want in public because the rules of ordinary decency and civility don’t apply to them. 2) The key to personal fulfillment is to have sex with as many people as possible and to view any restrictions on sexual liberty as forms of patriarchal oppression.
So what was the crime of the male student who was publicly asking for casual sex with female students who were total strangers? His crime was simply that he accepted feminist arguments and behaved in a manner that is consistent with feminist philosophy. But he did so without the proper genitalia.
Some who were near the propositioning male student said they overheard him saying he had a premonition he was going get to a “yes” from one of his targets. This talk of “premonitions” caused some to speculate that he was mentally unstable.
However, if accused of a specific crime, the offending student should not plead insanity. His chances of acquittal would be better if he had a sex change.
For “Evil will flourish, When Good Men Do nothing”. Feminism is Evil, it is beyond question. It has clearly and proudly demonstrated that itself..